# Win11 24H2 April Security Update/Vuln Issues

**URL:** <https://discuss.rapid7.com/t/win11-24h2-april-security-update-vuln-issues/57177>\
**Category:** InsightVM\
**Created:** [April 20, 2026, 2:00pm UTC](https://discuss.rapid7.com/t/win11-24h2-april-security-update-vuln-issues/57177 "2026-04-20T14:00:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dave](https://discuss.rapid7.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/ee7513/32.png) [@Dave](https://discuss.rapid7.com/u/Dave)\
**Post date:** [April 27, 2026, 6:53am UTC](https://discuss.rapid7.com/t/win11-24h2-april-security-update-vuln-issues/57177/10 "2026-04-27T06:53:06Z")

</div>

Yeah, I’m aware the difference is significant, and I already raised this during our regular check-in call with Rapid7 last week. If they want to remain relevant in the near future, they need to either strengthen their vulnerability detection capabilities or find a way to integrate and enrich Rapid7 InsightVM findings with the findings from Defender, which I already ingest through the data connector, as shown below.

 ![image](https://forum-uploads-hub-prod-1-us-east-1-rapid7-com.s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/5/56fbf7df5d566a79083a0f111c6479c2ef108c26.png)

I initially assumed that Rapid7 would enrich the InsightVM findings with Microsoft Defender findings, but this is not the case. That is why I currently have to handle this work in Power BI. My plan is to use our internal LLM capabilities to optimize and consolidate two exports from two different systems into a single table. This would give me the best of both worlds in one place. However, it is a significant amount of work and involves considerable trial and error.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.rapid7.com/t/win11-24h2-april-security-update-vuln-issues/57177)._